Thanks for both responses, I was merely wondering because everyone talks about Ken was put in a bad light, Tito was put in a good light.
Now I remember watching the other series and not identifying a good/bad guy but I wasn't as in to MMA previously as I am now hence the questions.
The only reason I'd dispute the good/bad scenario is thepure fact that I saw Kendall fight pre TUF and he was nowhere near Herman's league, hell I watched them train at the beginning of TUF and he was still nowhere near as good. However when it all came down to it at the end Kendall won and even if (as some claim) it was a 29 - 28 loss then that was still a dramatic improvement which I did not see from any of kens fighters.
You can only show what they have done, the producers can focus away from Ken's good points but if he has no bad ones they can't show them either. Same with Tito sure they can ignore what he does wrong but if he does nothing right then they can't make it up can they.
|