 |
 |
|
 |
 |
BJ Penn vs. George St. Pierre |
|
04-21-2007, 09:37 PM
|
 |
Internet Top Team
Reputation: ∞
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,167
|
|
BJ Penn vs. George St. Pierre
....is on Spike right now. Just a heads up.
|
04-21-2007, 09:50 PM
|
 |
Still Smokin
Reputation: ∞
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,092
|
|
i love watching this fight cuz bj beats the holy hell out of gsp...gsp was thanking god for cardio and takedowns
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The Sundance Kid
I wouldn't call anyone until I gave the Liquor and Pot a good couple of tries.
|
|
04-21-2007, 09:55 PM
|
|
Amateur
Reputation: 100-124
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 384
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TriangleChoke62
i love watching this fight cuz bj beats the holy hell out of gsp...gsp was thanking god for cardio and takedowns
|
As talented as BJ is....he does seem to gas out...I have noticed that his fighters on TUF are all saying that their conditioning is weak....could there be a link???? |
04-21-2007, 09:56 PM
|
 |
Contender
Reputation: 500+
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 887
|
|
DAMN IT smoogy. You got my heart racing thinking you had heard about GSP v BJ 2. summabitch. This was a good fight though so thanks. (i think)
__________________
"Casualties many; Percentage of dead not known; Combat efficiency; we are winning."
(Colonel David M. Shoup, USMC, Tarawa, 21 November 1943.)
|
04-21-2007, 09:58 PM
|
 |
Rookie
Reputation: 25-29
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 46
|
|
wow if you guys are keeping track of TUF 5... bj's team is doing extremly bad on it and it looks really bad for BJ... i jst hope people's opinions of him do not change seeing as how bad his team is doing right now
|
04-21-2007, 10:09 PM
|
 |
IM THE CHAMP!
Reputation: ∞
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Miami FL
Posts: 12,468
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by djkilljoy77
wow if you guys are keeping track of TUF 5... bj's team is doing extremly bad on it and it looks really bad for BJ... i jst hope people's opinions of him do not change seeing as how bad his team is doing right now
|
His 3 bad fighters lost how is that extremely bad? they were picked at the bottom for a reason
__________________
"CB Dollaway made a bad decision and now he gets a 2nd chance to earn a victory tonight against CB Dollaway" - Mike Goldberg
Fav MMA: Sudo, Stevenson, Shields, Kid, Werdum, Hendo, Rampage, Gomi, Sakurai, Okami, Penn, Kawajiri, Big Nogs
Fav Boxers: Sam Peter, RJJ, Pacman, Dawson, Frazier, Hatton, Winky Wright, Paul Williams, SSM, Miranda, Cotto, Linares
|
|
I've always thought it odd... |
|
04-21-2007, 10:26 PM
|
 |
neg'd 4 lyfe
Reputation: ∞
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,472
|
|
I've always thought it odd...
disclaimer: I'm new to the forum, and this might well be digging up a dead horse to give it a useless beating, but...
so BJ and GSP fought ostensibly, if not contractually, to see who is better for a shot at then-champ-Hughes, and GSP ekes out the split D.
Then Dana gave the first title shot to BJ, rather than GSP?
Did this raise anyone elses eyebrows? I can understand that BJ has a win over Matt, and going the Liddell route of avenging all previous defeats, but why even have Penn/GSP at all? don't get me wrong, it was a great, close fight, but isn't that obviously protecting your champion by having him fight #3 over #2 contender?
As much as I think he'll dominate at LW, I'd love to see BJ move up to 170 again.
rh
|
04-21-2007, 10:28 PM
|
|
Internet Top Team
Reputation: ∞
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,167
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by rivethead
disclaimer: I'm new to the forum, and this might well be digging up a dead horse to give it a useless beating, but...
so BJ and GSP fought ostensibly, if not contractually, to see who is better for a shot at then-champ-Hughes, and GSP ekes out the split D.
Then Dana gave the first title shot to BJ, rather than GSP?
Did this raise anyone elses eyebrows? I can understand that BJ has a win over Matt, and going the Liddell route of avenging all previous defeats, but why even have Penn/GSP at all? don't get me wrong, it was a great, close fight, but isn't that obviously protecting your champion by having him fight #3 over #2 contender?
As much as I think he'll dominate at LW, I'd love to see BJ move up to 170 again.
rh
|
Tee hee. GSP got injured and Penn replaced him. And matching up anyone with BJ Penn is the opposite of protecting them. |
|
|
|
|
04-21-2007, 10:28 PM
|
|
Still Smokin
Reputation: ∞
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,092
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by rivethead
disclaimer: I'm new to the forum, and this might well be digging up a dead horse to give it a useless beating, but...
so BJ and GSP fought ostensibly, if not contractually, to see who is better for a shot at then-champ-Hughes, and GSP ekes out the split D.
Then Dana gave the first title shot to BJ, rather than GSP?
Did this raise anyone elses eyebrows? I can understand that BJ has a win over Matt, and going the Liddell route of avenging all previous defeats, but why even have Penn/GSP at all? don't get me wrong, it was a great, close fight, but isn't that obviously protecting your champion by having him fight #3 over #2 contender?
As much as I think he'll dominate at LW, I'd love to see BJ move up to 170 again.
rh
|
gsp was originally scheduled to fight hughes at ufc 63 but he got injured...ufc had to find someone to put in there with matt hughes that would still sell ppv's and who better then bj penn? and i think after bj fights jens he will move back up to ww
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The Sundance Kid
I wouldn't call anyone until I gave the Liquor and Pot a good couple of tries.
|
|
|
|
Why No Grabbing The Fence |
|
04-21-2007, 10:30 PM
|
 |
Amateur
Reputation: 300+
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 397
|
|
Why No Grabbing The Fence
I can't make a new thread, so I will ask here. Why do they not let the fighters grab the fence? I mean if they don't want that, then make the octagon plexiglass or something.
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:18 PM.
| | | | |
