Rampage... - Page 3

chungt79 · #21 (**permalink**) 12-19-2006, 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theDonTurtle

I for one think Lindland got robbed, and rampage doesnt even look like the same guy that beat Chuck anymore and Chuck doesnt look like the same guy that got beat by Rampage. wand and finding god have sucked the mean streak out of Rampage

Lindland didnt get robbed. It was a very close fight. He doesnt look the same? Why? Because he got schooled by Shogun? Chuck actually looks exactly the same as he did three years ago. Just because he piled up a record by fighting bunch of one dimensional wrestlers and grapplers, that doesnt change anything about his fighting skill.

DW · #22 (**permalink**) 12-19-2006, 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chungt79

Lindland didnt get robbed. It was a very close fight. He doesnt look the same? Why? Because he got schooled by Shogun? Chuck actually looks exactly the same as he did three years ago. Just because he piled up a record by fighting bunch of one dimensional wrestlers and grapplers, that doesnt change anything about his fighting skill.

LOL

BigBanda · #23 (**permalink**) 12-19-2006, 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chungt79

Rampage is 28 and Chuck is like 36 or 37. There is no reason why Rampage cant beat chuck. Chuck hasnt fought a striker and he will lose when he faces Rampage. Chuck will finally pay for leaving his hands down. It will be a target practice for Rampage.

Ladies and gentleman once again a typical answer from Chungt lol. You make it seem like Liddell is going to be a push over for Rampage. Any person with a decent knowledge of MMA and the history, accomplishments, improvements/dis-improvements of these fighters knows that this fight can go either way.

chungt79 · #24 (**permalink**) 12-19-2006, 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theDonTurtle

LOL

LOL. Truth hurts, eh?

chungt79 · #25 (**permalink**) 12-19-2006, 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigBanda

Ladies and gentleman once again a typical answer from Chungt lol. You make it seem like Liddell is going to be a push over for Rampage. Any person with a decent knowledge of MMA and the history, accomplishments, improvements/dis-improvements of these fighters knows that this fight can go either way.

Liddell wont be a pushover but I think Ramapge will take this one. Also, it is not only this fight, but almost all fights can go either way. However, one is freed to lean towards one side more than other and I think Rampage will win this one.

TriangleChoke · #26 (**permalink**) 12-19-2006, 03:01 PM

Yes, the fight can go either way, and yes, chuck will have a much harder time with Rampage then he has had with any other fighter in the past few years...but to sit there and be certain that Rampage will KO Chuck or even beat him to the extent that he beat him in the last fight is just ignorant. RAMPAGE IS NOT THE SAME FIGHTER. Granted, Chuck's style hasn't changed much, but Rampage's career is on a downward spiral however u look at it. He got tooled by Silva and Shogun, and he hasnt been the same since. I honestly hope that Rampage gets back on top of his game and kicks ass in the UFC. Hell, I'd like to see him beat the sh*t out of chuck again, but I just dont see it going like that...

BigBanda · #27 (**permalink**) 12-19-2006, 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chungt79

Liddell wont be a pushover but I think Ramapge will take this one. Also, it is not only this fight, but almost all fights can go either way. However, one is freed to lean towards one side more than other and I think Rampage will win this one.

Fair enough, you have your opinion. Just wanted u to acknowledge this fight will not be 1 sided on either end. Just seems like you logon to the forums and then immediately look for a thread that has Chuck Liddell in the discussion and then share your biased point of views.

Anyways I do not know how this turned into a Rampage/Chuck thread, tends to happen a lot haha. Back to the topic... who do you think Rampage will face in February since he is rumored to fight then for the first time in the UFC.

TriangleChoke · #28 (**permalink**) 12-19-2006, 03:04 PM

rampage vs. rashad would be nice...

DW · #29 (**permalink**) 12-19-2006, 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chungt79

LOL. Truth hurts, eh?

since the first fight chuck is 6-0 all by ko or tko and rampage is 6-3 with 2 shady decisions and wins over ding dong yoon and minowa ,impresive and actually I think arona was robbed as rampage was out after that up-kick, bad call by the ref

chungt79 · #30 (**permalink**) 12-19-2006, 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TriangleChoke62

Yes, the fight can go either way, and yes, chuck will have a much harder time with Rampage then he has had with any other fighter in the past few years...but to sit there and be certain that Rampage will KO Chuck or even beat him to the extent that he beat him in the last fight is just ignorant. RAMPAGE IS NOT THE SAME FIGHTER. Granted, Chuck's style hasn't changed much, but Rampage's career is on a downward spiral however u look at it. He got tooled by Silva and Shogun, and he hasnt been the same since. I honestly hope that Rampage gets back on top of his game and kicks ass in the UFC. Hell, I'd like to see him beat the sh*t out of chuck again, but I just dont see it going like that...

You dont see Rampage tearing through LHW division of UFC? Whats the obstacle? Only one I can see giving Rampage trouble is Babalu. Chuck is a striker and Rampage does very well against strikers. Especially against someone like Chuck who depends on his looping right hand to save him from trouble. Rampage's stand up is much better than chuck's and Rampage can outstrike Chuck. Rampage will be able to take down Chuck because of this also. Rampage's loss to Wandy and Shogun are nothing to be embarassed about. Shogun is the best LHW right now. Rampage wont beat chuck like he did last time? Why not? Your argument just revolves around "he is not the same fighter"?? Um...yeah. Very solid argument (SARCASM).