Quote:
|
Originally Posted by prophet665
Neck subs are not needed to make you more flexible. In your opinion, which neck sub makes you more flexible? Which neck sub defense?
Yes, other countries or cultures are wrong if the kids are getting injured (not hurt, injured, there is a difference). This is not a cultural distinction I am making, it is a medical distinction. Do you even know what the physical reason why a person loses consciousness with a knock out punch? I will save you the Google search, it is because the brain short circuits from bouncing around in the skull. Are you suggesting that this is an acceptable practice for kids to have happen to them?
Ok...I am going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you just didn't think that last part through. Just in case I need to spell it out for you, yes, 12 year old kids fighting in a war is wrong. Not a little bit wrong, not half wrong, but 100% wrong.
So yes...those countries are wrong to let it happen. If you really need this to be reinforced, Google the words Congo and child soliders.
|
I was talking about subs in general that could make you more flexable. I don't think neck subs will be damaging to a teen child. When I was a kid I fought many times, and been in more than a few Rear Nakeds and head locks and I'm ok.
Well here in America kids box at the age of 10 or 12 with head gear on. I don't think it's an acceptable practice for an adult to have his brain bounce around in his head but I think with the right precautions, kids can do MMA before 18.
500 year ago, children were considered adults at the age of 12 so I'm not going to say their wrong. 12 year old boys have the ability to multiply also. Sure they havent finished growing yet but in the Bible it say's your an adult so who am I to complain. Most people are just hipocrites and these damn kids today act like adults anywayz.
I say let them get rear naked chocked
Linear Mode
