Ken-Tito...Why?

[Kewl144]

Originally Posted by killerinstinct

I'd be fine with a draw.the first round could've been scored 10-8 for Tito ,but no way could it be scored a win for Tito.Forrest very clearly won rounds 2 and 3.I don't even know how that's debatable.

Too bad that even Forrest, who was in the fight, disagrees with you and acknowledged that Tito won the fight.

[killerinstinct]

Originally Posted by Kewl144

Too bad that even Forrest, who was in the fight, disagrees with you and acknowledged that Tito won the fight.

Forrest is just respectful and said the judges didn't give it to him.I'm sure deep down inside he thinks he won that fight and I bet Tito does too.

[Kewl144]

Originally Posted by killerinstinct

Forrest is just respectful and said the judges didn't give it to him.I'm sure deep down inside he thinks he won that fight and I bet Tito does too.

Oh so now you're making arguments based on what you think Forrest thinks (but has never said)? Do you honestly believe this? If you do, then I think it's time to consulted a medical professional.

p.s - Forrest didnt say that the judges didnt give it to him. He said Tito won the fight.

[ArMnHC]

Originally Posted by kickass32

Put your biased opinions about Tito aside, watch the fight again.........Tito wins Rd. 1.......10-8
Rd 2 is clearly won by Forrest 10-9, and if you watch round 3, again with putting your biased opinions aside, you'll see Tito clearly outstruck, and landed better and more shots than Forrest, plus he got the takedown..........10-9 Tito..........

29-27 Tito.......

Thank god someone else around can see the light! i dunno why this shit is still up for debate...:banghead:

[chungt79]

Yeah, despite closeness of the fight, Tito was too dominant in the first round. I'd say even if Forrest wins the round 2 and 3, I would give it to Tito based on the level od dominace.