 |
 |
|
 |
 |
New Rules & Regs For Combat Sports In California |
 |

03-09-2008, 03:57 PM
|
 |
Let them come...LEGALLY
Reputation: 750+
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,187
|
|
New Rules & Regs For Combat Sports In California
Quote:
- NEW RULES & REGS FOR COMBAT SPORTS IN CALIFORNIA - MMA WEEKLY - Mixed Martial Arts & UFC News, Photos, Rankings & more
Sunday, March 09, 2008 - by Mitch Gobetz - MMAWeekly.com
The California State Athletic Commission is looking to institute some new rules and procedures that will effect mixed martial arts fighters. There are two major changes to California's policies that will possibly have a profound impact on some of the sport’s athletes.
The first major change will be that any fighter that applies for or currently wants to renew their license in California will be required to submit a urine sample. Also, the fighter may be required to provide a urine sample before and after a bout, as directed by the commission's representative.
A positive test for any of the following will be a violation:
–Stimulants
–Narcotics
–Cannabinoids (marijuana)
–Anabolic agents (exogenous and endogenous)
–Peptide hormones
–Masking agents
–Diuretics
–Glucocorticosteroids
–Anti-estrogenic agents
–Alcohol
The second change, which could be the most important of the rules changes, is that the outcome of a bout would be able to be overturned by the Commission. If the winner of a bout tested positive for a banned substance immediately following the bout, the fight could then be ruled a no contest.
As if stands now, California does not have the authority to overturn decisions for positive testing. The most popular case recently has been former UFC lightweight champion Sean Sherk and his positive test for Nandrolone. If these new rules would have been in place prior to his positive test, his fight with Hermes Franca would likely have been ruled a no decision.
Another new procedure that will be put in place will be an adjustment to the appeals process. Under the new rules, the commission must set a hearing within 30 days of receipt of the request for an appeal. The hearing may not be longer than one hour and the time shall be split evenly between the commission and the fighter.
The new hearing procedure would be in accordance with the following guidelines:
(1) First—the staff representative and/or deputy attorney general , who shall be limited to twenty minutes.
(2) Second—the requester and/or his or her legal counsel, who shall be limited to twenty minutes.
(3) Third—the rebuttal of the staff representative and/or deputy attorney general, which shall be limited to ten minutes.
(4) Fourth—the rebuttal of the requester and/or his or her legal counsel, which shall be limited to ten minutes.
(d) The commission staff bears the burden of proving his or her case by a preponderance of the evidence.
(e) The commission shall serve the written decision on the parties not later than forty-five (45) calendar days after the matter has been submitted. The decision shall contain factual findings, legal conclusions, and an order describing the action taken by the commission at a duly noticed meeting.
(f) Unless good cause is shown, a request for hearing shall be deemed abandoned and the request dismissed if the party who appealed and requested a hearing fails to appear at a duly noticed meeting, unless the party demonstrates good cause for that failure to appear.
These and other miscellaneous changes to the current rules and regulations governing professional combat sports in California are currently undergoing a 45-day public comment period. The Commission will consider any comments or concerns received by or at a scheduled April 22 hearing, at which point the rules and regulations are eligible for adoption.
|
I think they are looking to get the heat off of them after the Sherk fiasco, but have also made the rules more strict, which I am OK with, if it keeps the sport pure....
__________________
"To avoid being mistaken for a sellout, I chose my friends carefully. The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists."
-Barack Hussein Obama
What a P.O.S.
-Jrube on Barack Hussein Obama
|
 |

03-09-2008, 04:01 PM
|
 |
I love MMA
Reputation: ∞
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,761
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jrube
I think they are looking to get the heat off of them after the Sherk fiasco, but have also made the rules more strict, which I am OK with, if it keeps the sport pure....
|
Agreed. There needs to be assurances of reliable controls for banned substances.
__________________
Juanito said if Forrest beat Rampage he (Juanito) would retire - name your place Ibarra!! Visit the MMANews Upcoming Cards thread - best MMA fight rumor thread on the net, updated DAILY
Nick Diaz = future DREAM Welterweight Champion
|

03-09-2008, 04:31 PM
|
 |
Let them come...LEGALLY
Reputation: 750+
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,187
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diegonightmare
Agreed. There needs to be assurances of reliable controls for banned substances.
|
You are right there... This sport needs to be kept pure, and stay away from negative press.
__________________
"To avoid being mistaken for a sellout, I chose my friends carefully. The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists."
-Barack Hussein Obama
What a P.O.S.
-Jrube on Barack Hussein Obama
|
 |
No responses??? |
 |

03-09-2008, 06:17 PM
|
 |
Let them come...LEGALLY
Reputation: 750+
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,187
|
|
No responses???
I am surprised more people didn't find this worthy of a reply, I think getting more strict on testing for performance enhancing and/or illegal drugs is great for the sport of MMA....
__________________
"To avoid being mistaken for a sellout, I chose my friends carefully. The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists."
-Barack Hussein Obama
What a P.O.S.
-Jrube on Barack Hussein Obama
|

03-09-2008, 06:22 PM
|
 |
Amateur
Reputation: 125-149
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 199
|
|
I think they should randomly test the fighters for the 6 weeks leading up to the fight and conduct one test afterward. It's the only way to ensure steroids are not being used in the training camp. Scheduled prefight testing only means they have to cycle off for a period of time before the test.
|

03-09-2008, 06:31 PM
|
 |
Let them come...LEGALLY
Reputation: 750+
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,187
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Misfits138
I think they should randomly test the fighters for the 6 weeks leading up to the fight and conduct one test afterward. It's the only way to ensure steroids are not being used in the training camp. Scheduled prefight testing only means they have to cycle off for a period of time before the test.
|
That wouldn't be a bad idea at all...
__________________
"To avoid being mistaken for a sellout, I chose my friends carefully. The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists."
-Barack Hussein Obama
What a P.O.S.
-Jrube on Barack Hussein Obama
|

03-09-2008, 06:32 PM
|
 |
Strategy: Whoop His Ass
Reputation: ∞
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 14,216
|
|
I like the Idea of testing all the winners. If you plan to fight, you plan to win IMO, so everyone should be ready.
|

03-09-2008, 06:38 PM
|
 |
Imagination
Reputation: 750+
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 310
|
|
Testing positive for alcohol should not be a violation
__________________
Favorite Fighters- Mirko, Fedor, Couture, GSP, Hendo, Shogun, Diego
|

03-09-2008, 06:44 PM
|
 |
REDUCED TO MERE FILTH
Reputation: 750+
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: BJ, PENNsylvania
Posts: 966
|
|
Testing all of the winners will save time and money. Testing before fights, ie during training is too costly. With 18 fighters on one card, multiplied by the number of pre-fight tests, it'd be way too expensive to complete. Testing winners is the only way to go.
|

03-09-2008, 06:50 PM
|
 |
Amateur
Reputation: 125-149
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 199
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frag x 3
Testing all of the winners will save time and money. Testing before fights, ie during training is too costly. With 18 fighters on one card, multiplied by the number of pre-fight tests, it'd be way too expensive to complete. Testing winners is the only way to go.
|
Testing the winners still does not address the issue of the fighters who cycle off a certain peroid of time before the fight in order to pass the test. MANY fighters do this. If they did 1-2 random tests pre fight and one post, that would make it impossible for the fighters to train with roids.
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:55 AM. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|