Quote:
Originally Posted by Palma
How does that imply that Sanchez is as good as Penn or has to be as good as Penn to take Hughes' back? Here is the staple of my argument so try and follow allong if you can: Penn is a better grappler then Hughes... Sanchez is a better grappler then Hughes... Penn is a better grappler then Sanchez, but it has nothing to do with my argument besides they are both better then Hughes... does this make sense to you? I can draw a picture with crayon if helps.
|
Here is my argument...
Penn is a better grappler then Hughes.
Penn is a better grappler then Sanchez.
In order to take Hughes' back you have to be as good at grappling as Penn is.
Hmmm is that hard to follow as well?
I am done with this, this what always happens when we debate Palma. I bring up a point against ur point and you insult. I do not know why you feel the need to insult in a debate so quickly. Maybe you weren't hugged enough as a child, maybe you truly do not believe in what you are saying, or maybe you are just a prick, either way I do not care. There are far more entertaining people to debate with on this forum that actually debate and do not immediatly go to childish insults like calling someone "a little bitch." Its time to stop being a Frat Boy and grow up a little.