Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoylewis
In my opinion, it's best at this point and time for both parties to go their seperate ways. There has been some bad business and immaturity played out in both parties.
However, as far as his talent goes, alot of people say that Tito's talent has diminished. People, including Dana White, critcize him because his only fights that he finished were against Ken Shamrcok. However, if I remember correctly, it was Dana White who brought Shamrock back and pushed that Ultimate Fighter grudge match and was quick to push a rematch and promote the hell out of it.
So should they walk away from each other, or should this dysfunctional marriage keep on going?
|
The UFC needs Tito even less than this board needs another useless Tito thread. I don't know who your source was, but they left off Shogun, and don't know the difference between re-signing a fighter and resigning a fighter. I wouldn't bother reading them anymore.
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoylewis
If you look at who everyone has fought at the top of 205 and looking at records, Tito has done just as much as the other guys at the top with the exception of Rampage and maybe Machida. And he will get his chance to prove that he's better than Machida in 6 days.
|
Shogun, conveniently overlooked, is 4 and 1 in his last five.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hurt80
you guys ever wonder if the whole dana vs tito feud is just too sell the ppv's. just seems to me that you dont hear much of the tito n dana shit untill after an ortiz fight has been scheduled,and thats when the shit talking begins.i know the two genuinly dont like each other but i think maybe they have figured how to turn their personal fued into $$$$$....just a thought. dana has been called the vince mcmahon of mma, perhaps its true? LOL
|
Yes, I think the whole thing is a bullshit fabricated soap opera.
rh