View Single Post

  #63 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2008, 10:29 AM
hunterkiller's Avatar
hunterkiller hunterkiller is offline
Legend
Reputation: ∞
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: The Future
Posts: 3,264
hunterkiller will have their jersey retired.hunterkiller will have their jersey retired.hunterkiller will have their jersey retired.hunterkiller will have their jersey retired.hunterkiller will have their jersey retired.hunterkiller will have their jersey retired.hunterkiller will have their jersey retired.hunterkiller will have their jersey retired.hunterkiller will have their jersey retired.hunterkiller will have their jersey retired.hunterkiller will have their jersey retired.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TriangleChoke View Post
you may have been debating whoever about the chuck-tito feud, but



^^^i see nothing in this portion of your "debate" that relates anything even remotely close to the Tito/Chuck feud. Regardless of what you and whoever were debating, i disected this portion of your argument and just wanted to point out to you that this portion of your argument is CRAP because of the circumstances surrounding each of those fights..and I'm not talking about the "tito as in now." You mentioned mezger, matyushenko, wandy (2000), so I am speaking of the 1998-2001 tito ortiz. In this dissected portion of your "debate," you make absolutely NO mention of chuck liddell or the feud with tito, so let me say again.....your argument that i have posted above is CRAP
Those were 2 totally different points that you can't combine together and expect to make sense of. One was a conversation about Tito's victories that made him rise to fame. The other conversation was about the Tito-Chuck feud that rocketed Chuck to superstar status. They weren't interlaced points, it was 2 seperate points.
Reply With Quote