harlem i usually agree with a lot you have to say but saying Shane can't beat Floyd because he lost to Forrest makes me wonder about you.
I mean why not just say he can't because Floyd because he lost to Winky.
I mean Hopkins lost to Taylor but he beat Winky and Tarver.
Just because Fighter A loses to fighter B does not mean Fighter A can't be fighter C.
Math does not work.
Shane has the style speed and power to beat PBF. I am not saying its a lock but i would bet for Shane. Same goes for Cotto.
And yes if Shane or Cotto beats Floyd it does mean something, they beat the p4p king, which imo makes them better then he is.
Forrest lost to Mayorga and Shane would school Mayorga but Shane lost to Forrest. Soooooo why is that.
__________________
|