[kickbox]

Originally Posted by valheruking

I think the best fighters to never win the title are Sefo and LeBanner.
Alexey is a very good fighter though and he could beat just about anyone when hes on form.
But why does he deserve to be champ, he's been around as a contender for the world gp since 2001, thats 3 years without winning it, and about his prime, Peter Aerts is ranked no.2 in the world and hes 37 (and past his prime).
What is your reasoning for thinking he could have been champ more times than Hoost, i mean they were around at the same time from 2001 and Alexey wouldnt even reach Hoost in the tournament cause he was put out by guys like Filho,and Hoost is 13 years older so guess which one was in their prime.
The reason Hoost is the only 4 time k1 champ is because he's one of the best strikers ever, you don't hold a 3-0 record against cro cop in a standup only org unless you are.

a healthy Alex>>anyone in k1 besides andy Hug and Aerts possibly