Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Afro Samurai
I dont care if Horn is a better fighter then Eastman, its the matchup that im talking about
Chuck is facing a guy with zero striking and wrestling skills and only has a BJJ game, and it took him 4 rounds to beat him on the feet
Rampage is facing a guy with damn good striking skills, that can wrestle too and it only took him 2 rounds
Rampage is a wrestler with good boxing
Chuck is a wrestler with good KO power IMO but people label him as a Top 10 striker which I disagree with but im saying Rampage isnt a Top 10 striker yet it took him 2 rounds to beat a damn good striker, Chuck is supposively this and it took him 4 rounds to beat a guy with NO striking skills to speak of.
If you get knocked out over and over again you go into the fight with a fragile chin thats why he was knocked out so fast, the more you get knocked out the weaker your chin is thats a fact.
|
Horn just has a better chin than Eastman. I think Rampage is top ten striking and as far as people saying well Rampage should have finished Eastman in round one, those people are crazy, Rampage did a great job in his first fight in the biggest org. in the world. Even if it would have taken to the third round to KO Eastman, Rampage fought a good fight so you gotta let uneducated fan's pereception of what should happen in a fight just slide.