Thread: Shamrock won round1
View Single Post

  #17 (permalink)  
Old 02-12-2007, 09:32 AM
DonFrye's Avatar
DonFrye DonFrye is offline
HANK
Reputation: ∞
  
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,140
DonFrye will have their jersey retired.DonFrye will have their jersey retired.DonFrye will have their jersey retired.DonFrye will have their jersey retired.DonFrye will have their jersey retired.DonFrye will have their jersey retired.DonFrye will have their jersey retired.DonFrye will have their jersey retired.DonFrye will have their jersey retired.DonFrye will have their jersey retired.DonFrye will have their jersey retired.
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by dagreat1
Since when is MMA judged on damage? St. Pierre would've lost to Penn if that were the case but St. Pierre won because of TAKEDOWNS...

Research the rules, some of you are being fucking retarded and it makes this board look ignorant when so many people can't grasp the simple rules of MMA judging, organization to organization.

Shamrock got taken down at will, his TD defense was non existant, his guard was passed at will and he was completely controlled ont he ground, he couldn't get back to his feet, only throw knees to the body from the ground, that is not going to win you the round when you get taken down, controlled and have your guard passed at will.
Agreed. You can't honestly think that jabs and short knees to the body outweigh wrestling/BJJ domination and numerous takedowns. Are you guys freaking nuts? I guess, according to the posts on this subject, that Ken beat Royce. Tito beat Couture. I mean, all they did was take them down and then pass their guard. If it weren't for the slight factor that THEY WERE ALL DOMINATED ON THE GROUND.
Reply With Quote